http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm Soul Of All Systems Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:03:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm/comment-page-1#comment-865 slothsrcool Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:40:16 +0000 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm#comment-865 it should. WAP and WPA are considered the more advanced and more secure versions of encryption. It would only make sense that it has the ability to do a WEP encryption. usually it just depends on what the router can do. Hope this helps, if not let me know what type of set up you have and I might be able to help you out further it should. WAP and WPA are considered the more advanced and more secure versions of encryption. It would only make sense that it has the ability to do a WEP encryption. usually it just depends on what the router can do. Hope this helps, if not let me know what type of set up you have and I might be able to help you out further

]]> http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm/comment-page-1#comment-862 MrDeathmetaldrummer Sun, 23 Jul 2006 02:23:35 +0000 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm#comment-862 Small packets can slip through a firewall, where there are rules for sting comparisons. i.e. you have a rule to block packets containing the string worm.exe but the message is so split up/fragmented, worm is in one packet, .exe is in an other, therefore it doesen't match the rule set and allowed by the firewall. Small packets can slip through a firewall, where there are rules for sting comparisons.
i.e. you have a rule to block packets containing the string worm.exe
but the message is so split up/fragmented, worm is in one packet, .exe is in an other, therefore it doesen’t match the rule set and allowed by the firewall.

]]> http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm/comment-page-1#comment-861 roejames12 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:20:16 +0000 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm#comment-861 The package isn't in the Ubuntu repository unfortunately.. The package isn’t in the Ubuntu repository unfortunately..

]]> http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm/comment-page-1#comment-863 s????b???? s??s???? ?????? Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:59:51 +0000 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm#comment-863 Its your network key yes. And if not call your internet service provider and they should help you out. Its your network key yes. And if not call your internet service provider and they should help you out.

]]> http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm/comment-page-1#comment-860 roejames12 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:53:28 +0000 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm#comment-860 Btw, what's the common use for this? I'm using arpspoofing techniques, but it's frustrating, I'm trying to understand how it works better. I can forward packets from one IP to me, but how do you do a whole subnet? Btw, what’s the common use for this? I’m using arpspoofing techniques, but it’s frustrating, I’m trying to understand how it works better. I can forward packets from one IP to me, but how do you do a whole subnet?

]]> http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm/comment-page-1#comment-864 ctcoca Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:04:40 +0000 http://www.soulsystems.org/security/wifi-and-network-security.htm#comment-864 look it up in the user manual, mostly likely it will tell you how, or call SBC look it up in the user manual, mostly likely it will tell you how, or call SBC

]]>